Tuesday, May 30, 2006

2005 Asshole of the Year Awards

2005 Asshole of the Year Awards. (Media)

By Psycho Dave
Tue Dec 21st, 2005 at 03:01:29 AM EST

Mother Nature

Unfortunately, I wrote up last year's list before the Indian Ocean tsunami could wipe out nearly 265,000 people in Indonesia the day after Christmas. Ho, ho, ho.
Still, Mother Nature kept up her campaign against man all through 2005. This year, we saw the American Gulf Coast get hammered with so many hurricanes they had to start designating them using the Greek alphabet. Al Qaeda can blow up some sky scrapers and the Pentagon when they put their minds to it, but only Mother Nature can effectively destroy the entire city of New Orleans in a few days, killing over 1300.
And just when the Jihadists were high-fiving themselves that the "Great Satan" had gotten theirs, that's when Mamma smacked Pakistan with an earthquake in the middle of Ramadan, killing 84,000, proving once again that be it in war or disaster, casualties are always distributed unevenly between America vs. the rest of the world.
Perhaps the environmentalists are right and this is all due to global warming. Perhaps Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church are right and we're getting punished for being a "fag nation". However you see it, Mother Nature was definetely on the rag in 2005.

Judith Miller

This summer she was the hero of the journalism community, bravely going to jail instead of giving up her source in the turgid Plamegate drama to the grand jury. People rallied around her like she was a martyr for the Freedom of the Press. As the months wore on though, people slowly pulled their heads out of their collective asses and realized that the reasons Judith Miller went to jail had more to do with the Fifth Amendment than the First.
During the run-up to Operation Iraqi Freedom, Ms. Miller couldn't have been closer to the White House if she had had their collective dicks in her mouth (figuratively of course...letting that happen literally would be too Clintonesque.) Keeping a stable of "unnamed sources" such as the unfortunately named "Scooter" Libby and disavowed Iraqi-in-exile Ahmed Chalabi, Miller was the Bush Administration's conduit to the front page of the New York Times, printing the so-called "proof" of Saddam Hussein's Weapons of Mass Destruction programs so it could be quickly cited by Colin Powell, Condolezza Rice, and Dick Cheney during their cheerleading for the war.
Of course, the WMDs did not exist, and the efforts to silence those who refuted their claims resulted in the petty political backstabbing that we know and love as Plamegate. Ms. Miller might not have even had to go to jail, since Libby had given a blanket waiver to everyone he talked to, allowing them to cite him in their testimony. Why did Miller decide to go to jail instead? Could it be that *she* was the source who cited Plame all along?
Her editors at the New York Times, already having had to wipe egg off their face for the Jayson Blair scandal, turned on her and published editorials critical of her reporting. After spending 85 days in the jail (and after receiving a bizarre and possibly cryptic note from the aforementioned Libby) Miller decided to testify, and announced the retirement of her "stenographic journalism" from the New York Times on November 9th.
She is no longer unemployed though. Judy has just been signed to (of course) Fox News where she will join respected correspondents such as Geraldo Rivera and Oliver North in their quest to bring balance to the liberal media. Who saw that one coming?

Tom Cruise

2005 is the year that Tom Cruise's "exuberance" slid into pure and irrational pathos.
Apparently, ascending to OTVII (the highest level of "Operating Thetan" in the Scientologist *ahem* religion) makes one so happy you jump up and down on Oprah's couch like an retarded kid who ate too much sugar. It also cures dyslexia, and imparts instant knowledge on "The History of Psychiatry", which can be used for the grand purpose of dissing Brooke Shields on the Today Show for using Paxil. It all came to head with his creepy engagement to Katie Holmes, who he immediately made the carrier of his crotch fruit to head off rumors that he was gay. One can easily imagine Steven Spielberg praying heavily this summer that Cruise's antics would not fuck up the opening weekend receipts on War of the Worlds.
Prior to this year, Cruise was a bankable star with a knack for choosing good projects and directors. Now, he's just an asshole.

The person who killed Natalee Holloway

You suck because you took a person's life. You also suck for giving the media and excuse to cover her case non-stop and long after we stopped caring. Without you (and the incompetence of the Aruban police and the increasingly shrill bleating of Natalee's mother) we might be without this particularly noxious case of "missing-cave-bitch-of-the-week" journalism.
Or, maybe not.

The "Culture of Life"

Go and Google "asshole of the year" and the first entry is, of course, the 2004 version of this article. Entry four (at least, as of this writing) is a blog link to that same story, but the commentators were uniformly upset that I excluded Michael Schiavo from the list. "Can we nominate him Asshole of the Century?" one of them stated.
Sorry to turn this around on ya, but I'd like to nominate all of you "culture of lifers" (and especially the ones in government...I'm talking to YOU Jeb Bush) to be Assholes of the Year.
This sick, sad case brought out all wingbats...especially the religious ones who think that having a feeding tube crammed down your esophagus is "God's Will" and how He intended us to live. Face it folks...Terri was more of a vegetable than the spinach gathering frost in the back of my freezer, and even that spinach hasn't been around for FIFTEEN YEARS.
I've got an autopsy report to back me up. What do you have? Some hack-job book by the respected and esteemed Mark Fuhrman? Fuck you and all your media and Capitol Hill hacks for injecting yourself into this family's tragedy.

"Brownie"

Blame for the tragedy in New Orleans can be laid all over the place. You can blame the state for allowing the natural barriers such as the wetlands to be eliminated for shipping, or for allowing the levees to deteriorate over the years. You can blame the mayor for not evacuating people from the city as Hurricane Katrina loomed. You can blame the cops for joining the looters instead of stopping them. Hell, you can be Kanye West and blame George W. Bush for "not caring about black people" (which is something I think he gets from his mother, the ever tactful Barbara Bush)
But if there is an overarching symbol of the incompetence with which this disaster was handled, there are few more potent figures than FEMA Director Michael "doin' a heck of a job" Brown.
Brown, whose previous experience was being the director of the International Arabian Horse Association (a position he had to leave in disgrace), was truly Nero fiddling while Rome burned. According to e-mails released during the time, in the days before Katrina was due to make landfall, Brown was fussing about whether to dress up "tie or no tie?" As it made landfall, he bragged that he was a "fashion god." A fashion god that had to be told to roll up his sleeves, so he can look as hard working in the crisis as the President (har-de-har-har.)
Whether it was whining about how his Labor Day weekend was ruined ("I'm trapped now. Someone rescue me!") or responding to the SITUTATION CRITICAL messages from FEMA officials who were actually in New Orleans with "is there anything we need to tweak?" it is not hard to see why Brown was quickly replaced as head of FEMA. What is incredibly hard to digest is that his new job is running a disaster relief consulting firm.
Alas, he will probably get money from this, long after his name has faded from the public consciousness. After all, the neo-cons know how to take care of their own.

Harriet Miers

Liberals often accuse conservatives of being stupid. But the Bush White House acts like conservatives are stupid too. Having got his last Supreme Court nominee, John Roberts (who had a short, but impressive record) confirmed without too much trouble, when William Rehnquist died and freed up another spot, Bush decided to give O'Connor's spot to his personal White House counsel, Ms. Miers.
Her nomination was a disaster for the West Wing. Having credentials that were even more slight than Brownie's (she had never been a judge, nor had she ever tried a case before the Supreme Court) for a position that was even more important, the White House thought they could get Miers through the gauntlet without having to do much more than have Karl Rove give James Dobson a wink and nod regarding her views on abortion.
Surprisingly, the Right which had been riding Bush's cock for five years did an about face on Ms. Miers, whose only REAL qualification was "loyalty to the administration." And after the disgrace of Brownie, the public was in no mood for cronyism. You know you made a huge miscalculation when conservative harpy Ann Coulter and obese drug addict Rush Limbaugh turn on you.
Even though she eventually withdrew her nomination, I think we should reward her with a nomination for Asshole of the Year. Perhaps it's unfair, since this is the Bush administration's fuck up, more than hers. But I think the Bush administration is due for a Lifetime Achievement in Assholery about now.

The anti-war left

Public support for the Iraq War is at an all time low. For a majority of Americans, it is more of a question of when or how to withdraw than whether or not we should. However this change in public consciousness occured, we can be sure it happened in spite of the efforts of the anti-war left, instead of because of it.
Instead of attacking the right's position on the war, the activist left have been feeding it, and in the process turning off many of those who might be inclined to support their position. Getting the US to withdraw isn't the ultimate goal for many of them. Rather, it is a focal point to protest the worldwide American "hegemony" and "oligarchy" and a bunch of other words they aren't sure of the meaning of, but it sure sounded snappy in that Noam Chomsky soundbite...
I will once again remind all of you that THE SIXTIES ARE OVER. A protest isn't performance art, so keep the lesbian poets doing odes to their clitoris away from the podium. And if the Che-shirt wearing hippie waving a "Free Saddam" sign doesn't get the irony of what he's doing, then I'm not inclined to explain it to them.

Marguerite "God Warrior" Perrin

For our religious crazies spot, I nearly nominated Pat Robertson for his calling for the assassination of Hugo Chavez. Yep, a very Christian sentiment. But in the broad spectrum of stupid shit Pat Robertson says, it's not his greatest hit, and besides, our man in Virginia Beach is also deserving of a Lifetime Achievement in Assholery award for his previous accomplishments.
So instead I give a nod to the new blood, the rabid (but admittedly, much more benign) "God Warrior." On the strength of one otherwise crappy Fox reality-show, she has given us a slew of catchphrases ("Tainted!" "Dark-sided!") and secular America a big "told ya so" about fundamentalist Christians. We only wish that the other family had given the visibly embarrassed husband a good chunk of that money to go and hire a divorce attorney.

The Minuteman Project

The issue of illegal immigration has become the conservative "cause celebre" this past year. In April, about a thousand "Minutemen" took their lawn chairs and a few cases of Natural Light to positions along the Arizona-Mexico border to assist the Border Patrol in identifying illegal immigrants trying to cross over into the United States.
Never mind that the most Mexicans trying to cross the border can see their beer bellies a mile away and go around them, which calls into question their effectiveness, the Minuteman Project is pretty much just white males media whoring for news cameras and conservative politicians looking to gain a constituency. Their leader, Jim Wilcox, also goes around raising money for the Minuteman Project, which is funny since it is staffed with volunteers who bring their own resources to their patrols. Where does the money go, Jim?
The group is also supported by the neo-Nazi National Alliance, who passed out fliers at their events. Though the Minutemen deny association with them, the connection was enough to convince a similar citizens border patrol group, The California Border Watch, to split with the Minutemen, citing racism and fascism in their ranks.
Our porous borders and the creation of an entrenched social underclass in this country is an issue that will have to be faced sooner rather than later. Well, perhaps later if the issue is being forced by a bunch of pseudo-vigilante hillbilly yahoos.

Sony

"Most people don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
These "famous last words" were spoken by Sony BMG's president of global digital business, Thomas Hesse in a November 4th interview on NPR. Well, thanks to your company's paranoia over digital rights management, now *everybody* knows what a "rootkit" is...
See, if you happened to purchase one of the twenty titles Sony BMG placed it's XCP copy protection software on, regardless of whether or not you clicked the "I Agree" pop-up, the CD downloaded a program to your computer that cloaked itself using rootkit techniques. While this is sleazy in and of itself, it also opens your computer up to all sorts of viruses, eager to exploit this new backdoor.
Removing the rootkit would fuck with your box. The "patch" that Sony offered for infected PCs just made things worse. Finally, they agreed to stop shipping CDs with XCP copy protection, but only after thousands of computers had been compromised.
While I'm not intrinsically inclined to take up the cause of anyone who purchases a Ricky Martin or Celine Dion CD, this will hopefully be the scandal that makes mainstream America aware that (at least according to the corporate world,) *you don't own anything.*
The head office didn't cc you to memo, but you no longer buy your favorite band's CD, you buy a license for their music. According to the EFF, the EULA on the protected CDs was even more restrictive than the software, requiring you to delete all of their music if you move out of the country or if your house get's burglarized. This goes for DVDs and videogames too. Sony recently patented "lockware" which would tether a videogame to one particular console and prevent a person from loaning a game they purchased to a friend or reselling it.
Still gonna line up for a PS3 on launch day?

The oil companies

Wasn't this war in Iraq supposed to make oil cheaper?
The price of gasoline and a barrel of oil hit record highs this year. While economists are quick to remind us that it is still lower than the inflation-adjusted prices of 1981, we crept closer to that high everyday. The price of oil broke every psychological barrier analysts set for it. Filling up your tank was an increasingly painful experience. The usual suspects were cited: increased demand from China and India (really? Did their consumption jump that high in the space of four months?) environmentalists blocking the development of new refining capacity (why would the oil companies want to build new refineries, since this lack of capacity is what keeps their prices high?) and of course, taxes. Driving by a gas station in 2005 was a depressing chore. Even more filling it up when you'd run your engine on fumes for too long.
And that was before Hurricane Katrina hit and shut down the rest of our refining capacity that the environmentalists were unable to. Prices rocketed to near crisis levels.
After selling 1.5 TRILLION dollars worth of oil since 2002 and pocketing 125 billion in after market profits, what do the energy companies do with the money? Are they trying to discover new oil fields or increase their refining capacity? (I'm sure after the oil shock of this past year, building new refineries would have enough public support to drown out the whines of a few Sierra Club members.) Are they investing money in alternative energy, as interest is high and I'm sure demand will follow...
Actually, what are they doing with that money? Lighting their cigars with hundred dollar bills? They certainly aren't making billions per quarter by just "passing the cost onto the consumer." It got so bad that Bush even took a short time out on his goal of filling the Strategic Reserve (aka. "the scheme to inflate the price of oil by keeping X amount of barrels off the market every day.") When their antics got even the Republicans to start talking about regulation, the price at the pump dropped about a dollar, and everyone's happy....right?
If there was a bright light to be found in any of this, it is knowing that while filling up is putting the pinch on your pocket, the guy driving the H2 with a Bush/Cheney '04 bumper sticker, and a "Support our Troops" magnet from his house in exburbs is getting anally raped.

Bono (submitted by thankyougustad)

Nelson Mandela has a few ideas on what might help the people of Africa . He says, "our peoples dream of an African Renaissance, as a consequence of which we will overcome a devastating past and ensure that ours also becomes a continent of democracy and peace, respect for human rights, development, prosperity and the restoration of the dignity of all Africans."
Apparently someone named Bono, who spends most of his time riding around in giant rubber duckies with someone named The Edge, wearing $1,800 sunglasses everywhere he goes, thinks the solution to African poverty is music. And not just any music, but his own brand of hypocritical and insipid pop music. Together with contemporary, Bob Geldof (who, on a daily basis, snorts up enough money to feed the entire Sudan), two incredibly rich assholes organized a group of white rock bands to play a series of massively expensive concerts in London to raise "awareness" of the problems in Africa. If that isn't bad enough, it seems to have worked: what does it say about our world when someone with only one name addresses the UN, is named one of Time Magazine's Men of the Year, is given awards by Portugal, and has the ear of the Pope? Actually, that makes more sense now that I think about it. Still, what does it take to make them realize that this choad is doing nothing but capitalizing on the plight of real people in order to sell records?
Maybe extremely wealthy rock stars have a place giving joint speeches with George W. Bush, and maybe Africa can be helped by patronizing white people, but let those people at least have a first and last name.

Monday, September 26, 2005

Laura Bush Recalls Painful Past

Laura Bush Recalls Painful Past: "Laura Bush Recalls Painful Past
The Associated Press
Thursday, March 2, 2000; 7:15 p.m. EST
PROVIDENCE, R.I. �� Laura Bush, wife of GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush, on Thursday recalled the pain of a 1963 accident that killed her boyfriend, saying 'it was crushing.'
'All I can say about that (is) it was a very, very, tragic accident I was involved in when I was 17 years old, almost 40-something years ago,' Bush said. 'It was a terrible accident. It was terrible for everyone involved.'
Bush said the grief remains.
'I know this as an adult, and even more as a parent, it was crushing ... for the family involved and for me as well,' she said.
Bush would not comment further and quickly resumed talking about her husband.
The accident occurred Nov. 5, 1963, when Bush was talking to a friend while she was driving to a party in her hometown of Midland, Texas, the New York Post reported.
At an intersection, she apparently failed to see her boyfriend, Mike Douglas, driving south. The vehicles collided and Douglas was thrown from his doorless Jeep, breaking his neck. He died instantly.
Midland officials would not release the full accident report, referring Freedom of Information requests for the document to the attorney general of Texas. He has until May 15 to decide if he will make the report public.
An abbreviated version of the report concluded neither Douglas or Bush could be blamed for the accident, the Post reported. "

Laura Bush Kills Motorist

Laura Bush Kills Motorist: "Laura Bush Kills Motorist
A reader asked me about this a few days ago. An astute Texan pointed out the answer to me this morning:

'The wife of Gov. George W. Bush was responsible for a traffic accident that killed a high school classmate in Midland 37 years ago, according to a newly released accident report. Investigators said a 1963 Chevrolet driven by Mrs. Bush - then Laura Welch, a high school senior - ran a stop sign and struck a Chevrolet Corvair driven by Michael Douglas. Copies of the accident report - parts of which are illegible - were released Wednesday by Midland City Attorney Keith Stretcher after state Attorney General John Cornyn held that the information was public....Mr. Stretcher, the Midland city attorney, initially declined to release any information about the accident on the grounds that it involved minors and therefore was exempt from disclosure under the Texas Public Information Act. He also contended that disclosing the information would violate the parties' privacy rights. Police listed two violations as contributing to the accident, both by Mrs. Bush. One checked box read 'disregard stop sign or light,' and the other was illegible....Both drivers were Robert E. Lee High School students. Neither was drinking, and no citations were issued, according to the report.' - Dallas Morning News, May 4, 2000

I hope when next I run a stop sign and kill someone that there are no citations issued.

It would be a terrible thing to truly accidentally kill someone in a traffic accident because of your own negligence. And of course no one knew she would end up married to a president. But the bottom line is in 1963 Midland Texas, if this has been a young black man to have run a stop sign and killed the town's white football star, he would have either been executed, still rotting in prison today, or dragged from the back of a pick up truck until dead. That's just the truth.

Posted by: disgusted at Nov 17, 2004 6:29:19 AM

Saturday, September 17, 2005

2004 Asshole of the Year Awards

2004 Asshole of the Year Awards. (Media)

By Psycho Dave
Tue Dec 21st, 2004 at 03:01:29 AM EST

As 2004 comes to a close, it's time to consider the year's most vile, dimwitted, and disgusting personalities.

The nominees are...

Karl Rove
The very thought of George W. Bush is enough to get the most pacifist, tree-hugging liberal barking like a rabid dog. But for all the hate he inspires, he's but a figurehead; the mere representation of a system that props him up. The "Mayberry Machiavelli" is the man behind the man. Whether it's riling up God-fearing, homophobic Red Staters straight to the voting booth or managing to make every Vietnam vet who has run against his coke-snorting, draft-dodging boss look like a traitor, Rove is a force that inspires as much awe as he does disgust.

Michael Moore

Though he dresses like a blue collar slob from Michigan, in the black-is-white/day-is-night mentality of this odd year, Moore is the representation of elitist liberal Hollywood at its most braindead. Even those inclined to support his views cringe at the notion that Iraq was a paradise of children flying kites before America showed up. Moore is the liberal even liberals would like to shut up.

Scott Peterson

You've just been sentenced to death...Merry fucking Christmas. Now if we can just get Larry King and Greta Van Susteren to shut the fuck up about your case, my life will be complete.

Michael Jackson

What more can I say? Jacko needs to have a serious talk with R. Kelly's people when it comes to damage control. Guilty or not guilty, I think prison would be good for Michael. A couple of years of lifting weights inside, he'd come out ripped, change his name to something like Michael Al Shareez Bin Faisal like his Nation of Islam buddies suggested, get some prison tattoos, cornrows, and maybe record a single with Fiddy Cent that would go to number one with the suburban gangsta set. I know I'd like to see it.

Lynndie England

Operation Iraqi Freedom is quickly turning into America's first feminist war. 2003 gave us Pvt. Jessica Lynch, America's Prisoner of War sweetheart. 2004 brings us Pvt. England, our generation's Lt. Calley. Despite looking like the product of mating too close to the gene pool, Pvt. England singlehandedly gave the Arab world a new excuse to strap on some dynamite and blast themselves to their seventy-two virgins (all, hopefully better looking than Ms. England.) Like Pvt. Lynch, there are apparently nude photos of her floating around out there. Unlike Pvt. Lynch, I will not be jerking off to them.

Jesus "The Christ"

Jesus has licensed his name to some pretty dubious stuff in the past, but this year he went off the deep end. First, he licensed the rights to his story to Mel Gibson, begetting the $670 million dollar grossing, highly revered, and thoroughly mediocre The Passion of the Christ, inspiring millions of Christians to believe that a movie about a man being flayed to death by cackling Jews was somehow "beautiful". Then he allied himself with the Republican Party, Wal Mart, Toby Keith, and Ford pickups with gunracks in them to help George W. Bush win his first election. Hopefully this means the rapture is coming soon and he will be taking his fellow assholes with him.

Jessica Simpson

I was about to put Britney Spears in this slot, but all her drinking, loser boyfriend blowing, snorting coke off a toilet seat antics kinda sorta of humanized her for me. Where the Brit's career is currently being subsidized by flaming gay men, Ms. Simpson keeps stretching her fifteen minutes because of ex-frat boy Maxim subscribers. Get it straight guys, she's not that hot. I prefer her lipsyncing sister Ashlee because she looks good without a nose job. Plus, she's quite possibly dumber than Paris Hilton.

The scumbag who shot Dimebag Darrell

The nineties were a depressing time for metal. From Metallica's Black Album to the retarded "rap-metal" stylings of Limp Bizkit, headbangers had a hard time in the Alternative Nation. Pantera and its guitar mastermind Dimebag filled that void. One Mark David Chapman wannabe destroyed it. Fuck you. Be he in Heaven (or more likely Hell), I hope wherever Dimebag is, I hope the beer, bud, and bitches are plentiful.

Vladimir Putin

Growing up at the ass end of the Cold War, the Russian leaders I remember were all fairly innocuous. Gorbechev with his funky birthmark and glastnost. Boris Yeltsin is probably the only world leader who would be fun to get drunk with. Putin comes along, and even though he's ex-KGB, he seems to be another in a good streak of West Friendly Russian politicians. Wrong. For all the whining Americans do about Dubya rolling back our constitutional rights, he has on nothing Vlad, the Peristroika Impaler. Whether it's cracking down on Chechnyans, taking over Yukos Oil, or injecting his political opponents with those leftover stores of Dioxin, Putin has pulled a "War on Terror" apeshit that makes the most fascist neo-con look like Anne of Green Gables.

"The Donald"

Bush's cabinet resembles "The Apprentice" boardroom more and more. The people you root for get fired while the idiots inexplicably keep showing up week after week. Donald Rumsfeld's head should have been the first on the block when it came to post-election house cleaning, but as in business, asskissers rise to the top. Even though our soldiers hate him since he still hasn't gotten around to equipping the troops with, say, armor after being in Iraq for nearly two years, "The Donald" has yet to hear the words, "You're fired". I suppose this catergory can also include the other Donald, who despite having bad hair, a trophy wife, and bankrupt casinos, is still considered the ultimate business guru.

Psycho Dave (and all the other dipshit "bloggers")

Despite his having no experience in the realm of world affairs; despite having not taken so much as a political science course at a community college; despite the fact that his taste in art runs towards velvet Elvis paintings and he's only really funny when he's crapping his pants drunk, Psycho Dave and his fellow (ugh,) "netizens" feel qualified to comment on every sort of topic that slides through the ADD ravaged minds. They suffer from the delusion that since they are glued to CNN, Fox, and Google News they somehow know more than the average citizen. So, the "blogosphere" caught Dan Rather, once? Was the story of GWB's coke and draft-dodging days all the important anyway? Plus: people who use words like "netizen" or "blogosphere" are not qualified to write.

Please vote for your (least) favorite choice, or feel free to write in your own below. Let the venting begin!


Poll

Asshole of the Year?
Karl Rove 34%
Michael Moore 7%
Scott Peterson 1%
Michael Jackson 1%
Lynndie England 8%
Jesus 14%
Jessica Simpson 0%
Dimebag Darrel's killer 5%
Vladimir Putin 7%
The Donalds 9%
Psycho Dave 7%

Votes: 413

Friday, September 16, 2005

An Unnatural Disaster: A Hurricane Exposes the Man-Made Disaster of the Welfare State

An Unnatural Disaster: A Hurricane Exposes the Man-Made Disaster of the Welfare State by Robert Tracinski Sep 02, 2005

Robert Tracinski is the editor of TIADaily.com and The Intellectual Activist.

It took four long days for state and federal officials to figure out how to deal with the disaster in New Orleans. I can't blame them, because it also took me four long days to figure out what was going on there. The reason is that the events there make no sense if you think that we are confronting a natural disaster.

If this is just a natural disaster, the response for public officials is obvious: you bring in food, water, and doctors; you send transportation to evacuate refugees to temporary shelters; you send engineers to stop the flooding and rebuild the city's infrastructure. For journalists, natural disasters also have a familiar pattern: the heroism of ordinary people pulling together to survive; the hard work and dedication of doctors, nurses, and rescue workers; the steps being taken to clean up and rebuild.

Public officials did not expect that the first thing they would have to do is to send thousands of armed troops in armored vehicle, as if they are suppressing an enemy insurgency. And journalists—myself included—did not expect that the story would not be about rain, wind, and flooding, but about rape, murder, and looting.

But this is not a natural disaster. It is a man-made disaster.

The man-made disaster is not an inadequate or incompetent response by federal relief agencies, and it was not directly caused by Hurricane Katrina. This is where just about every newspaper and television channel has gotten the story wrong.
The man-made disaster we are now witnessing in New Orleans did not happen over four days last week. It happened over the past four decades. Hurricane Katrina merely exposed it to public view.

The man-made disaster is the welfare state.

For the past few days, I have found the news from New Orleans to be confusing. People were not behaving as you would expect them to behave in an emergency—indeed, they were not behaving as they have behaved in other emergencies. That is what has shocked so many people: they have been saying that this is not what we expect from America. In fact, it is not even what we expect from a Third World country.

When confronted with a disaster, people usually rise to the occasion. They work together to rescue people in danger, and they spontaneously organize to keep order and solve problems. This is especially true in America. We are an enterprising people, used to relying on our own initiative rather than waiting around for the government to take care of us. I have seen this a hundred times, in small examples (a small town whose main traffic light had gone out, causing ordinary citizens to get out of their cars and serve as impromptu traffic cops, directing cars through the intersection) and large ones (the spontaneous response of New Yorkers to September 11).

So what explains the chaos in New Orleans?

To give you an idea of the magnitude of what is going on, here is a description from a Washington Times story:

"Storm victims are raped and beaten; fights erupt with flying fists, knives and guns; fires are breaking out; corpses litter the streets; and police and rescue helicopters are repeatedly fired on.
"The plea from Mayor C. Ray Nagin came even as National Guardsmen poured in to restore order and stop the looting, carjackings and gunfire....
"Last night, Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco said 300 Iraq-hardened Arkansas National Guard members were inside New Orleans with shoot-to-kill orders.
" 'These troops are...under my orders to restore order in the streets,' she said. 'They have M-16s, and they are locked and loaded. These troops know how to shoot and kill and they are more than willing to do so if necessary and I expect they will.' "
The reference to Iraq is eerie. The photo that accompanies this article shows a SWAT team with rifles and armored vests riding on an armored vehicle through trash-strewn streets lined by a rabble of squalid, listless people, one of whom appears to be yelling at them. It looks exactly like a scene from Sadr City in Baghdad.
What explains bands of thugs using a natural disaster as an excuse for an orgy of looting, armed robbery, and rape? What causes unruly mobs to storm the very buses that have arrived to evacuate them, causing the drivers to speed away, frightened for their lives? What causes people to attack the doctors trying to treat patients at the Superdome?
Why are people responding to natural destruction by causing further destruction? Why are they attacking the people who are trying to help them?
My wife, Sherri, figured it out first, and she figured it out on a sense-of-life level. While watching the coverage one night on Fox News Channel, she told me that she was getting a familiar feeling. She studied architecture at the Illinois Institute of Technology, which is located in the South Side of Chicago just blocks away from the Robert Taylor Homes, one of the largest high-rise public housing projects in America. "The projects," as they were known, were infamous for uncontrollable crime and irremediable squalor. (They have since, mercifully, been demolished.)
What Sherri was getting from last night's television coverage was a whiff of the sense of life of "the projects." Then the "crawl"—the informational phrases flashed at the bottom of the screen on most news channels—gave some vital statistics to confirm this sense: 75% of the residents of New Orleans had already evacuated before the hurricane, and of those who remained, a large number were from the city's public housing projects. Jack Wakeland then told me that early reports from CNN and Fox indicated that the city had no plan for evacuating all of the prisoners in the city's jails—so they just let many of them loose. [Update: I have been searching for news reports on this last story, but I have not been able to confirm it. Instead, I have found numerous reports about the collapse of the corrupt and incompetent New Orleans Police Department; see here and here.]

There is no doubt a significant overlap between these two populations--that is, a large number of people in the jails used to live in the housing projects, and vice versa.
There were many decent, innocent people trapped in New Orleans when the deluge hit—but they were trapped alongside large numbers of people from two groups: criminals—and wards of the welfare state, people selected, over decades, for their lack of initiative and self-induced helplessness. The welfare wards were a mass of sheep—on whom the incompetent administration of New Orleans unleashed a pack of wolves.

All of this is related, incidentally, to the incompetence of the city government, which failed to plan for a total evacuation of the city, despite the knowledge that this might be necessary. In a city corrupted by the welfare state, the job of city officials is to ensure the flow of handouts to welfare recipients and patronage to political supporters—not to ensure a lawful, orderly evacuation in case of emergency.

No one has really reported this story, as far as I can tell. In fact, some are already actively distorting it, blaming President Bush, for example, for failing to personally ensure that the Mayor of New Orleans had drafted an adequate evacuation plan. The worst example is an execrable piece from the Toronto Globe and Mail, by a supercilious Canadian who blames the chaos on American "individualism." But the truth is precisely the opposite: the chaos was caused by a system that was the exact opposite of individualism.

What Hurricane Katrina exposed was the psychological consequences of the welfare state. What we consider "normal" behavior in an emergency is behavior that is normal for people who have values and take the responsibility to pursue and protect them. People with values respond to a disaster by fighting against it and doing whatever it takes to overcome the difficulties they face. They don't sit around and complain that the government hasn't taken care of them. And they don't use the chaos of a disaster as an opportunity to prey on their fellow men.

But what about criminals and welfare parasites? Do they worry about saving their houses and property? They don't, because they don't own anything. Do they worry about what is going to happen to their businesses or how they are going to make a living? They never worried about those things before. Do they worry about crime and looting? But living off of stolen wealth is a way of life for them.

People living in piles of their own trash, while petulantly complaining that other people aren't doing enough to take care of them and then shooting at those who come to rescue them—this is not just a description of the chaos at the Superdome. It is a perfect summary of the 40-year history of the welfare state and its public housing projects.

The welfare state—and the brutish, uncivilized mentality it sustains and encourages—is the man-made disaster that explains the moral ugliness that has swamped New Orleans. And that is the story that no one is reporting.

Source: TIA Daily -- September 2, 2005
[This article is available for reprinting free of charge. For the permission to reprint, write to editor@TIADaily.com. Click here for a shorter version of this article.]

The Intellectual Activist magazine articles on the web: Islam vs. the West, Envi
ronmentalism's Big Lie, Man's Best Came With Columbus and Altruism's War on Reality.TIA Daily articles on the web:An Unnatural Disaster, Anything Less Is Suicide, The Empire of the Pursuit of Happiness, America's War Song, A Real Invasion, The Hinge of the World, Liberty and Union, What Have We Lost?, Martha Stewart, "See How America Grew", Human Achievements Blog and TIA Daily Sample Issue.

The An Individualist Plan for Rebuilding
The Hurricane of Anti-Americanism: The Blame Game's Real Target
The Real "Two Americas"
Lord of the Barflies
More samples from TIA Daily

Darwin or Design?

Darwin or Design?

One of America's longest-running dramas is being revived in Ohio. There, the state school board is wrestling with whether to give the theory of evolution sole billing in its revised science curriculum, or to make room for an alternative theory called "intelligent design."

Inevitably, the 1925 Scopes "monkey" trial springs to mind, along with "Inherit the Wind," the perennially popular play based on that trial. And, don't forget, only three years ago Kansas had a major replay of the controversy when its education board removed evolution from the curriculum altogether, a decision later reversed when voters installed a new board.

Ohio is following a somewhat different script. Intelligent design, depending on the commentator's perspective, is seen as either a reasonable explanation of nature's more complex formations - or simply Bible-based "creationism" in a different costume.

Unlike traditional creationists, the proponents of intelligent design don't argue with evolution's eon-spanning time frame. Nor do they deny Darwin's observations about change over time. Their basic point is that a guiding intelligence, instead of natural selection, better explains some of those changes and the intricacies of such structures as cells. They are purposefully indefinite about who, or what, that intelligence might be.

But are these ideas a valid scientific theory warranting equal time in biology classes?

At this juncture, the answer is probably "no." Intelligent design, while it has some scientists on its side, has not been scrutinized in scholarly journals. It doesn't have decades of corroborating scientific discovery and field work behind it, as does evolution.

This doesn't mean the theory of evolution is exempt from criticism, doubt, or even revision. That, after all, is part of the scientific method. Intelligent design offers a critique of evolution which shouldn't be dismissed out of hand. Analysis that seeks cause only in matter can't explain all the turns of life on earth. On the other hand, the proponents of design will run into unintelligent outcomes like genetic dead-ends and disease. Science teachers should be free to bring up these contrasting approaches and probe the controversy they generate.

And if parents strongly object to any teaching of evolution on religious grounds, they should be able to have their children excused from that portion of a class.

Classroom discussion is one thing; official insertion of religious teaching into the public schools is another. Courts have tended to strike down state laws that require "creation science" to be taught. If intelligent design becomes a required part of biology courses in Ohio or other states, it will face similar challenges.

By year's end, the Ohio Board of Education plans to make a decision. It's only reasonable that evolution be given its earned place in science classes as an enduring theory of physical science that explains a lot, if not everything. But the door should be kept open to discussion, questions, and possible alternatives.